The District’s climate and natural landscape can create natural hazards such as heatwaves, bushfire, flooding, storms, coastal inundation and erosion. Climate change will exacerbate these natural hazards. While planning for resilience has traditionally focused on responses to natural hazards and climate change, it is increasingly being used to consider a wider range of social and economic shocks and stresses.
Effective planning can reduce the exposure to natural and urban hazards and build resilience to shocks and stresses. Planning for population growth and change needs to consider exposure at a local level, as well as the cumulative impacts at district and regional levels.
State agencies and councils use a range of policies and tools to reduce risks from natural and urban hazards. Centralised and coordinated collection of data on hazards, particularly on how infrastructure is exposed to hazards, will help embed resilience in land use planning and infrastructure planning.
Natural and urban hazards
The climate, vegetation, topography and pattern of development in the District mean that bushfire and flooding will continue to be hazards. Placing developments in hazardous areas or increasing the density of development in areas with limited evacuation options increases risk to people and property.
Parts of the District such as at Taren Point and Kingsgrove are exposed to flooding, whether from major rivers or from local overland flow. This can impact travel and community assets like open space and directly affect people and property. The NSW Government has developed the Floodplain Development Manual 2005. It provides councils with policy directions and tools for managing exposure to flooding.
Some coastal areas of the District, such as Kurnell, and areas along the Georges River, Port Hacking and Cooks River are at risk of coastal inundation and erosion. Potential sea level rise associated with climate change could also lead to saltwater intrusion into freshwater ecosystems and damage coastal open space and infrastructure. It will be important to manage community assets and infrastructure at risk, such as Wills Ground in Earlwood, to support sustainable and resilient communities.
Past and present urban development and activities can also create urban hazards such as noise and air pollution and soil contamination. Compared to many cities around the world, Greater Sydney enjoys excellent air quality, which enhances its reputation as a sustainable and liveable city. However, the combined effect of air circulation patterns in the Sydney Basin, local topography, and proximity to different sources of air pollution such as wood-fire smoke, can lead to localised air quality issues.
Transport movements along major roads and rail corridors generate noise and are a source of air pollution. The degree of noise or air pollution can be related to the volume of traffic and the level of truck and bus movements. The design of new buildings and public open space can help reduce exposure to noise and air pollution along busy road and rail corridors. Public transport, walking and cycling, as well as hybrid and electric cars provide opportunities to reduce air pollution. The NSW Government has recently strengthened regulation of ventilation outlets in motorway tunnels, which will also help reduce air pollution.
Soil and groundwater contamination is another urban hazard which will require careful management as the District grows and land uses change. This is particularly important when planning for more sensitive land uses such as schools, open space and low density residential neighbourhoods in areas with the potential for pre-existing contamination. State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land and its associated guidelines manage the rezoning and development of contaminated land.
Greater Sydney, particularly its rural land, is at risk from biosecurity hazards such as pests and diseases that could threaten agriculture, the environment and community safety. Biodiversity hazards are being managed by the NSW Government through the Greater Sydney Peri Urban Biosecurity Program.
In planning for future growth, consideration of natural hazards and their cumulative impacts includes avoiding growth and development in areas exposed to natural hazards and limiting growth in existing communities that are exposed and vulnerable to natural hazards. In exceptional circumstances, there may be a need to reduce the number of people and amount of property that are vulnerable to natural hazards, through managed retreat of development.
The impact of extreme heat on communities and infrastructure networks can also be significant. More highly developed parts of the District can be exposed to extreme heat as a result of the urban heat island effect. Increasing tree canopy cover is important to help reduce those impacts. The State Heatwave Sub Plan, which is within the NSW State Emergency Management Plan, details the control and coordination arrangements across State and local governments for the preparation for, response to, and immediate recovery from a heatwave.
Current guidelines and planning controls also aim to minimise hazards and pollution by:
- using buffers to limit exposure to hazardous and offensive industries, noise and odour
- designing neighbourhoods and buildings that minimise exposure to noise and air pollution in the vicinity of busy rail lines and roads, including freight networks
- cooling the landscape by retaining water and protecting, enhancing and extending the urban tree canopy to mitigate the urban heat island effect.
Minimising interfaces with hazardous areas can reduce risks. Clearing vegetation around developments on bushfire-prone land can help reduce risks from bushfire, but must be balanced with protecting bushland and its ecological processes and systems. Planning on bushfire-prone land should consider risks and include hazard protection measures within the developable area. The Rural Fire Service requires new developments to comply with the provisions of Planning for Bush Fire Protection 2006.